A New York State casino referendum for voters has one attorney questioning the ballot’s wording november
In November, ny voters are scheduled to vote for a referendum that will allow several new casino resorts become built through the entire state. But if one Brooklyn attorney is effective, that referendum will be halted due to language within the ballot question which he claims violates state legislation.
Referendum Language Questioned
The language in the referendum carries a quantity of ‘legislative purposes’ that paint the proposition in a light that is unmistakably positive. For example, the concern mentions ‘promoting work growth, increasing aid to schools and allowing local governments to lower property taxes.’ That language was authorized by their state Board of Elections in July.
But now, lawyer Eric J. Snyder is contending that the language in the bill violates New York legislation. In accordance with case filed in the New York State Supreme Court, Snyder alleges that the language violates the State Constitution’s prohibition on the application of general public money in the aid of ‘private undertakings.’
‘The Constitution is pretty clear that you can’t use public cash to sway or influence a vote,’ Snyder said.
Snyder isn’t the one that is only has had up issues with the language in the referendum. Many government watchdog groups also view it as one-sided, and spiritual groups have also noted the language